AlignyxGhost Core V2
Legal index
Security reporting

Vulnerability Disclosure Policy

Responsible vulnerability reporting, safe-harbor boundaries, testing limits, and response expectations.

Effective
July 28, 2026
Updated
July 28, 2026
Owner
[Your LLC Legal Name]

Attorney-review draft

This policy is a production-grade draft for counsel review. It should be published only after the monitored security contact, severity taxonomy, triage roster, evidence-retention workflow, and safe-harbor language have been approved.

Security reports should be sent through the published security contact for [Your LLC Legal Name]. If the contact route is not yet monitored, do not represent vulnerability intake as production-ready.

Authorized reports

We welcome good-faith reports about vulnerabilities that could affect confidentiality, integrity, availability, tenant isolation, authentication, authorization, billing entitlements, deletion controls, security headers, or privacy-safe logging.

Reports should include a concise description, affected URL or component, reproducible steps, expected impact, evidence sufficient to validate the issue without exposing customer content, and contact information for coordinated follow-up.

Testing limits

Do not access, modify, delete, exfiltrate, disclose, or retain customer data; do not perform destructive testing, persistence, social engineering, phishing, spam, denial-of-service, physical attacks, or attacks against third-party providers.

Stop testing and report promptly if you encounter non-public data, secrets, private keys, payment data, personal data, workspace content, or evidence that another tenant may be affected.

Safe-harbor boundary

For good-faith research that follows this policy, avoids privacy harm, avoids service disruption, and reports promptly, we will not intentionally pursue legal action solely because of the research. This safe harbor does not authorize violations of law, third-party rights, customer agreements, provider terms, or testing outside the stated boundaries.

A final counsel-approved version should define any bug-bounty status, reward eligibility, disclosure timing, duplicate handling, severity taxonomy, remediation communication, and exceptions.

Response expectations

We aim to acknowledge credible reports, triage severity, preserve metadata-only evidence, remediate verified issues according to risk, and coordinate disclosure when appropriate. Timelines may vary by severity, exploitability, customer impact, provider dependency, and legal obligations.

Security concerns may be sent to security@example.com. Do not include raw customer content, secrets, credentials, exploit payloads that cause harm, or third-party personal data.

These pages are protective attorney-review drafts. They should be reviewed, jurisdiction-adjusted, and approved by counsel before public launch, paid subscriptions, or regulated customer use.